CyberHarassment: Exploring Solutions

Online abuse is, unfortunately, a common problem. It seems that there are some people in this world who simply get a lot of pleasure out of abusing others and the online world is a fertile ground for finding vulnerable victims. By vulnerable I’m not really referring to people who have any particular physical, emotional , or psychological vulnerabilities but rather the fact that we are all vulnerable in the online world to having our personal and professional reputations injured or destroyed.  All knowledge and information about us which is out there is available to be twisted, misrepresented, distorted, exaggerated, lies invented based on it, and otherwise abused to present us in a negative light, in public, amongst those who either don’t know us or only know us casually.

We are also vulnerable to this abuse in real life but it’s harder to do and requires more structure and organization. It’s also harder to prove that it’s going on in real life. In the online world where nothing ever really gets deleted (despite the harassers attempts to remove the evidence) it can almost always be located and therefore the allegations proven.

Someone, somewhere has almost always archived it for posterity.

So, while the lies never get erased, your refutations to the lies also never get erased. If you’ve done your job properly the truth can and will overwhelm the lie and the liars even if they outnumber you.

However, going through that process is time consuming and often quite painful because those who engage in cyberharassment and stalking often have nothing else to do. They can (and do) spend hours doing this because they are dysfunctional people living dysfunctional lives whereas those of us being targeted with this abuse are trying to lead active, normal lives and this nonsense takes us away from that.

While these stalkers and harassers are usually incredibly stupid people, they do excel at lying so you will be dealing with their false allegations with the police, social media sites, friends, family, etc. sometimes for years. In the case of psychopaths, it’s pretty much guaranteed that they’ll be on your case for years or until they get themselves incarcerated in prison or a psych ward.

This is one reason why this type of harassment can’t be ignored or swept under the carpet. The lies, if left to fester can and do take on a life of their own and become ‘truth’ by virtue of the fact that there is nothing out there refuting them.

When it comes to one’s personal and professional reputation these lies can have a deep and often immeasurable impact, especially vicious ones like the current ‘call everyone you hate a pedo’ rage.

The more seriously mentally ill the cyberharasser/stalker is, the further they will go with their abuse and lies.

If you:

1. Challenge their story by challenging the fact that they have no evidence? Voila, evidence gets fabricated in the form of fake photoshopped screenshots, fake pedo web sites set up under the targets personal name as the domain, quoting known liars or people who have an obvious bias, etc.
2. Expose their lies and their cowardice? Voila numerous false allegations/complaints filed with police, social media sites you’re a member of, government agencies, employers (past and present), schools, social service agencies (if you receive assistance), etc.
3. Confront their lies? Voila they recruit other stalkers to spew them for them so that they can claim ‘they aren’t the only ones that hate you’. Suddenly you’re surrounded by a goon squad wallowing in its own filth of lies, the intent being to overwhelm the truth with the lies.

So, what are the solutions?

What can we do to deal more effectively with such lunacy online. Aside from having those who engage in this abuse carted off to their local Psych Ward in strait jackets or to prison. While that will certainly help resolve the problem, it isn’t the easiest thing to do and in the mean time we all have to survive the crazies.

While we can’t change the fact that there are seriously disturbed people out there in the world, many of whom have access to the Internet and are going to be problems… there are often small things that can be done that end up having a big impact.

This recent article from Wired provided some interesting examples and insight into this issue:

Curbing Online Abuse Isn’t Impossible. Here’s Where We Start BY LAURA HUDSON

According to the article, a simple process like providing a specific and detailed explanation for why someone was banned reduced the recidivism of the bad behavior dramatically whereas not providing an explanation resulted in a ‘disturbingly high’ recidivism rate.

The team also found that it’s important to enforce the rules in ways that people understand. When Riot’s team started its research, it noticed that the recidivism rate was disturbingly high; in fact, based on number of reports per day, some banned players were actually getting worse after their bans than they were before. At the time, players were informed of their suspension via emails that didn’t explain why the punishment had been meted out. So Riot decided to try a new system that specifically cited the offense. This led to a very different result: Now when banned players returned to the game, their bad behavior dropped measurably. –Extract from Curbing Online Abuse Isn’t Impossible

A solution like this actually accomplishes three things which are excellent for the consumer of the service.

1. The user has a clear understanding of what the behavior that was considered negative is, and knows that if they want to stay on the site they can’t engage in that specific behavior again.  This creates a solid deterrent for that negative behavior.
2. The support staff are required to properly examine the issue and provide a specific reason, presumably with the evidence that the person did indeed violate the rules. This has the benefit of ensuring that Support staff do their jobs properly and can actually justify the suspension (or lack of suspension based on a complaint). That is they can justify it based on actual written policy rather than just an arbitrary spur of the minute, get this off my desk fast, decision or I feel sorry for person A, I’m on their side and will help them even though the person isn’t doing what person A says they’re doing, etc.
3. Most importantly, any sense of injustice or unfairness at the decisions is also removed because everything has been properly explained and justified. This, in and of itself, can lead to self-correcting behavior. Justice has been done.

Of course, the person might find the standard itself objectionable which is a different issue but one that should be addressed by any social media site which actually wants to be a comfortable place for their users. They could have a special forum where these types of discussions can occur directly with Support staff or Development staff. Explanations will resolve 90% of the issues and the other 10% probably need to be fixed. If they can’t be fixed, people are kept informed and things are unlikely to get out of hand. Or, at least less often, than they would without these measures in place.

The reality is that the current recidivism rate for ‘bad’ behavior is disturbingly high on sites like Twitter and Facebook, and the decisions to remove or leave items being objected to are arbitrary, inconsistent, and frequently not based on the written site rules/policy.

Frequently items which obviously violate the social media site’s policy are left while items which don’t are removed and the posters suspended, banned or otherwise punished despite the fact that they didn’t violate any policy or rule.

I’m currently in a battle with Twitter and have been for a nearly a month to get my business Twitter account unsuspended. Twitter refuses to interact with me to provide any explanation, rationalization, or justification for their arbitrary (and unjustified) actions.

I have provided a detailed refutation to Twitter (in several emails now) including the tweets that I was tweeting at the time my account was suspended based on a false complaint, and screenshots of Twitters own interface showing that at least one allegation is completely bogus and without any merit. This has, so far, been completely ignored.

Not only is this frustrating to the user who is the target of cyberbullying / harassment and being further victimized by false accusations of allegedly doing what is actually being done to them, but it enables and encourages the cyberbullies and harassers to take things further and further. After all, their scam worked.

And you can rest assured they will be smugly gloating about the fact that it worked while coming up with ways to escalate things even further. Of course, they’ll blame you for the escalations. How dare you stand up to their abuse and do so publicly. That’s cyberbullying them according to their sick and twisted thinking. Lol.

The article proposes the following and I agree because it’s focusing entirely on the behavior that’s exhibited rather than the content of what is said. What is said only matters when it leads to negative behaviors and on those grounds free speech has always had some limitations.

You can’t shout ‘fire’ in a theatre because of the impact that will have on behavior.

CyberBullying and harassment are the same. When you falsely call someone a Pedo or Pedo enabler and post it all over the web in numerous blogs, web sites, torrents, pastes, on DarkNet with personal information in Doxbin, etc. etc. there is an impact not only to the person targeted but to others who might decide to interact in negative ways with the target because of those false allegations.

So, this isn’t about free speech. It’s about bullying and harassing behaviors.

Extracted from the article:

What would our social networks look like if their guidelines and enforcement reflected real-life community norms? If Riot’s experiments are any guide, it’s unlikely that most or even many users would deem a lot of the casual abuse, the kind that’s driving so many people out of online spaces, to be acceptable. Think about how social networks might improve if—as on the gaming sites and in real life—users had more power to reject abusive behavior. Of course, different online spaces will require different solutions, but the outlines are roughly the same:

•    involve users in the moderation process,
•    set defaults that create hurdles to abuse,
•    give clearer feedback for people who misbehave,
•    and—above all—create a norm in which harassment simply isn’t tolerated. 

–Extract from Curbing Online Abuse Isn’t Impossible

Bully: Antonio F. Lopez impersonator of Kree Love. Documentation ofHarassment 2.

Antonio F. Lopez, impersonator of UK teen, Kree Love, has been engaging in cyberharassment/stalking for several years as I've indicated in previous posts.

This appears to be an activity that he enjoys engaging in since he essentially picks a target, someone he resents for reasons known only to himself but appear to include jealousy as a component, and then fabricates reasons to justify targeting that person. The purpose of fabricating reasons is to recruit support, convince that support to move into the front lines, so that he is in a low risk observer position but can enjoy the show and enjoy the perceived power of being able manipulate foolish people easily.

Going back to the extracts of the quotes I provided in the previous blog we can see that these are key factors involved in the psychiatric disorder of cyberharassment and cyberstalking as well as real life criminal harassment and stalking.

There is a difference between normal online arguments and full-fledged cyberharassment campaigns as I've demonstrated in previous blog posts. Normal people do not engage in lengthy and persistent cyberharassment and cyberstalking campaigns.

1. “Both types of bullying [cyber and real life] are acts of aggression, are repeated, and involve a power imbalance between the victim(s) and perpetrator(s).”

2. “Resentful stalkers are fully aware the victim is cognizant of the stalking, but continues to fulfill a distorted vendetta he/she feels is warranted. Fear and distress experienced by the victim are the goals of this type of stalker.” (extracted from above quotes)

In this post I will only be publishing small extracts from chats and other material which is available in a more complete and detailed form on this web site: http://ptr.anonygrans.org. If you scroll down on that web site you will see an embedded PDF document which contains everything in detail.

This began in November 2012, when Antonio aka Kree attempted to recruit me and other people associated with Anonymous anti-pedophilia social activism on Facebook into his DarkNet Child Trafficking Scam which he tried to sell as a 'sting'. Most of us rejected this recruitment attempt. However, I left on friendly terms and maintained a friendly relationship with him fully expecting that he and anyone he recruited would eventually find themselves in jail, given that it was an obvious fraud and not a 'sting' as he claimed.

He had asked me not to tell TW about his activities. I agreed and didn't say anything to TW.

There are, however, some interesting things about this recruitment attempt that should be pointed out.

In October, he had mentioned that he had found a paying job. So when he attempted to recruit me, I asked him if he was being paid to do this. I was wondering if this was the paying job he had referred to previously.

[11/3/2012 7:41:19 AM] [removed]:is someone paying you to bring them down?

[11/3/2012 7:41:26 AM] Kree Love: not bring them down.

[11/3/2012 7:41:36 AM] Kree Love: to massivly scam a bunch of pedos out of 500k.

[11/3/2012 7:41:38 AM] Kree Love: a month.

******************

[11/3/2012 7:42:11 AM] Kree Love: and basically

[11/3/2012 7:42:21 AM] Kree Love: we've created a store

[11/3/2012 7:42:24 AM] Kree Love: which sells children

It's pretty clear here that this is the paying job.

So my questions are:

Who would pay Antonio F. Lopez, impersonating UK teen, Kree Love, to do this and why?

What was the ultimate goal of this paying job?

Was it to scam pedos? Or, Was it to entrap certain people associated with Anonymous?

The end result would likely have been the latter as a result of the first if everything had played itself out. That is, if those of us targeted for recruitment who weren't direct personal friends of Kreepy had agreed to participate.

We didn't.

Now let me just say here and emphasize that I seriously doubt this was Fed Op to target Anonymous. The Feds to my knowledge don't work in this way. That is, they are far more interested in the serious hackers in Anonymous like those who were members of LulzSec than they are in a bunch of anti-pedophilia Facebook activists who don't generally spend time on DarkNet. And those were the types of people that Kreepy was trying to recruit.

So, I don't know the answers to those questions. All I can say based on the facts that I currently have is that it's clear by the conversation, that he was being paid to recruit people to participate in a DarkNet Child Trafficking Scam.

On February 8, 2013, despite several friendly exchanges with Kreepy and no indication from him that anything was wrong, I went to a Facebook group that we were both members of at that time and found the following item posted to the group.

Kree Love: "I'd like to give a round of applause to T[removed] W[removed] and Kitty SoftPaws Hundal for consistently threatening me over the past week or two. But for Kitty, many thanks for attempting to destroy an Echelon operation, and I hope you enjoy your Dox this weekend."

Now, I knew absolutely nothing about what he was talking about. TW hadn't shared any information with me. Kreepy hadn't shared any information with me and I was caught completely by surprise by these false accusations. I had no idea why or what had triggered this.

When I asked, Thomas Schroeder aka Thomas W. Cook's response was to engage in lame attempts at 'trolling' which can be translated as 'behaving like a tard' since he doesn't know what trolling is. Essentially, he refused to provide any information about these allegations or evidence to support them. Kreepy later appeared and did the same.

Since I hadn't even communicated with Kreepy over the previous two weeks before the Feb. 8, 2013 post, and since Kreepy refused to provide any evidence, It was obvious to me that Kreepy was lying for some reason.

If someone had been engaging in a deception by using my name in communications Kreepy would have provided that and I would have had something to investigate. The fact that he didn't provide that and hasn't to this date, was the indicator that he was lying.

At this point I had no idea what he meant by attempting 'destroy an Echelon operation'.

Essentially Echelon is a fantasy of Kreepy's who appears to have spent a little too much time on gaming servers. It doesn't exist.

Finally after a lengthy going back and forth which continued into the next day, on February 9, 2013, Kreepy finally revealed that it was related to his DarkNet Child Trafficking Scam. At this point I explained that I had not said anything to anyone including to TW about his scam.

TW had apparently been posting the DarkNet Child Trafficking Scam pricelist that Kreepy had created on Twitter and Facebook. I was unaware of this at the time.

TW later joined the thread and stated that I was not the one who provided the information to him, it was someone else.

However, Kreepy insisted that it had to be me because he allegedly hadn't provided anyone with the document outside of the people listed in his Skype group at the time he added me. This came out in a Facebook chat initiated by Christopher J Erwin aka Jason Steele in an attempt to intimidate and harass me into 'confessing'. Since I hadn't done what I had been accused of there was nothing to confess and I made that clear to the numerous participants that had been added to the discussion.

This was his second fabrication since there were in fact two men who were not in the group at the time I was there who Kreepy attempted to recruit and to whom he sent the DarkNet Child Trafficking Scam price-list. And there was a third man who was in the group when I was there but also rejected the recruitment attempt as well. So, there were four possibilities for the leak altogether.

This fabrication has now been exposed because TW outed the person who gave him the DarkNet Child Trafficking Scam price-list.

[2/8/2013 5:25:23 PM] T[removed] W[removed]: kk... just get me that link pls.. perhaps some fear will help save Kree.. I"m putting some ' SE' plays out there.. he just may have you to thank if it is not too late.. but just lay low , I appreciate that tidbit of info, I just need a direction to point the gun most times

[2/8/2013 5:29:54 PM] *** B[removed] J[removed] sent EchelonPrices.pdf ***

There is a voice recording of the interaction on the http://ptr.anonygrans.org web site as well.

[caption id="attachment_436" align="aligncenter" width="471"] Antonio F. Lopez, impersonating Kree Love and exchanging the PDF with BJ[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_437" align="aligncenter" width="392"] Antonio F. Lopez, impersonating Kree Love providing a sample communication with a buyer to BJ[/caption]

Michael Babcock also, mistakenly, outed the fact that another person had told Connie Wierick about both the scam and the DarkNet Child Trafficking Scam pricelist long before TW had sent her the pricelist. Babcock is obsessive about posting every single chat and email exchange he has engaged in with anyone publicly on paste-bin or other similar sites. He did this with a chat he had with Connie. He then, provided TW with the link in one his rage email exchanges with TW.

In addition I saw a communication between TW and the third person where he explained what happened in his interaction with Kreepy.

I have screenshots of the these last two as well but at this point all we need is the above to demonstrate that Kreepy lied. He had indeed given the pricelist to someone who was not in the group when I was there and it was that person who provided TW with the information about the scam and gave TW the DarkNet Child Trafficking Price List.

Kreepy is well aware that both of his fabrications have been proven to be irrefutably false and yet he continues to focus all of his attacks on me.

He and his little cult of followers ignore TW for the most part which is ironic because he was the one who actually exposed the scam and put all of this in motion.

Kreepy continues to use TW as bait to recruit people and then divert them into targeting me instead of TW who is the person they actually have issues with.

Since BJ was outed by TW, he has also been targeted quite viciously by various people who I believe were incited by Kreepy through his shills to target him.

Given this attitude of Kreepy's from the start, it isn't surprising to me in the least that he refuses to accept my very reasonable offer, that if he removes the lies about me, I'll deactivate the blog posts exposing him and walk away from it all.

He would then be free to go after TW if he chooses to. After all, that is what he's claiming that he wants to do after he's 'taken me out'.

It is, of course, just another lie.

Kreepy is a seriously disturbed cyberharasser/stalker who enjoys targeting people. He has no interest in Tim and doesn't care that his DarkNet Child Trafficking Scam was exposed.

He just needed an excuse to target someone. He's enjoying the success he achieved at manipulating certain fools into targeting BJ.

He's being less successful with me because I'm forcing him to stay in the forefront and not letting him sidetrack me into fights with others and frankly he's just not very good at it technically or socially given all the alleged expertise he claims in IT and Social Engineering.

Which is why he had to bribe someone to take over and do his dirty work for him.

He couldn't convince anyone to do it for free other than a bunch of equally incompetent failures who are contributing more to discrediting him than they are helping him. Lol.

[caption id="attachment_448" align="aligncenter" width="450"] Kreepys offer of bitcoins to target Kitty Hundal is accepted[/caption]

More to come ...

Bully: Antonio F. Lopez aka Kree Love, Documentation ofCyberharassment. 1 Updated.

Updated January 15. Kreepy found a taker for his bounty! Lol.

In this post, I'm going to refer to Antonio F. Lopez, the 30 year old American, impersonating 16 year old Kree Love, as either Kreepy or Peter Pan. It's just simpler.

In my earlier post, Kree Love: Evidence of Lies, I provided some documentation of Kreepy's cyberharassment/stalking campaign against Jamie McKinley. By the time young McKinley was done with Kreepy he was running for cover and stole the identity of a 16 year old UK teen to cover his tracks and hide.

However, patterns of behavior persist (the cyberharassment/stalking) and Kreepy has learned a few things since then.

For example, he's now learned that he can engage in cyberharassment/stalking by staying out of the front lines and manipulating others into doing it for him so that he doesn't have to deal with the consequences of his own behavior. They do. He can just sit back and enjoy the show.

He's also learned to select targets that are vulnerable in some way (or that he thinks are vulnerable) to ease his way and mitigate against the threat of retaliation.

The reality is that Kreepy has a long term demonstrated history of engaging in, and taking pleasure in, cyberharassment/stalking.

Why he does this actually doesn't matter. Some people claim that those who have been bullied in real life will often come online and engage in bullying to exact revenge as though this is something that should be considered a mitigated factor. It isn't. It's no more a mitigating factor than child abusers who were also abused as children. Why? Because the reality is that there are far more people who have been victims of bullying or child abuse who don't engage in cyberbullying or abusing children than there are those who do. This is the indication that there is no causal relationship between the two. Given the documented strategy of bullies and abusers to blame their victims or others for their crimes one would have take any claims they made of being victims themselves with a strong dose of skepticism and require evidence.

In the post, CyberHarassment, A Pattern Of Behavior, I look at general issue of cyberharassment and how Kreepy and some of the others mentioned in this blog fit the profile by describing their activities in general terms.

In the post, Antonio Lopez aka Kree Love, Narcissist, I explore the personality profile and how he demonstrates the profile with his own behavior.

This post will go into a little more depth on how he fits the standard cyberharasser/stalker profile in the context of the things that he has tried to do to me and failed or did to me.

The generally recognized profile of the Kreepy style of cyberharasser/stalker is:

"Although traditional bullying and cyber bullying share certain features, they are distinct phenomena. Both types of bullying are acts of aggression, are repeated, and involve a power imbalance between the victim(s) and perpetrator(s)."

See more at: http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/articles/cyber-bullying#sthash.q6jrRyT6.dpuf

"Psychiatrists, psychologists, and other mental health professionals view most stalkers as suffering from a psychiatric illness(s) causing them to be psychotic or delusional. When not deemed as psychotic, stalkers are considered plagued by some type of personality disorder or fueled by unique psychological factors. In the most severe cases, the stalker is defined as a predatory stalker or sociopath.

Whatever the psychological rationale may be, the stalker rarely comprehends the fear he/she is causing the other person. Blinded by his/her motivations to be stalking someone in the first place causes them to lose sight of the fear and terror they are causing. When anger, rage and hostility towards the victim are involved, the stalker is fully aware of the anguish he/she is causing, but feels the victim is deserving of the fear or simply does not care.

II. Resentful Stalkers: This type of stalker can be dangerous given their perceived motivation for stalking. Resentful stalkers are fully aware the victim is cognizant of the stalking, but continues to fulfill a distorted vendetta he/she feels is warranted. Fear and distress experienced by the victim are the goals of this type of stalker. For this type of profile, the stalker believes the victim both deserves and requires being frightened because they have caused them and/or others anguish and distress."

https://www.ipredator.co/ipredator/cyber-stalking/stalking-cyber-stalking/

Note that the resentment the stalker feels can be perceived rather than real. That is, they can target a person for any number of reasons that have nothing to do with the victim or their actions, but rather be the result of a misinterpretation or delusion.

A current example which demonstrates that Kreepy fits the profile of the Resentful Stalker perfectly can be seen in the following screenshot of a post Kreepy posted to the The Bone Yard last night (January 14). In what appears to be a fit of rage, Kreepy has posted a 'bounty' (LOL) on me. He wants all my content removed and my ability to create new content prevented.

Now, let me just take this opportunity to point out that Kreepy is well aware of the fact that I have repeatedly and generously (in my opinion) given him a way out of this.

He has been told, repeatedly, that all he needs to do is remove the lies he has posted about me as well as the lies he's had others posted about me and I will deactivate this content. 

So why won't he accept this easy way out? Because he doesn't want the drama, the cyberharassment and the cyberstalking to end. He wants to perpetuate it.

The reasons that he's in a rage right now is because:

1. He hasn't been able to recruit outside parties to target me other than 2 who are also cyberharassers/stalkers in their own right. The first was Michael Babcock, who he knows is untrustworthy, unreliable, and quite unstable. In fact, Babcock more than any of the other cohorts in Kreepy's little RatKrew, is destroying any credibility they might have had because he is obviously either delusional or a pathological liar. Little of what he says matches reality. The second was Heather Martin who, while leaving her hate blog up, has run for cover. Heather is known for her deceptions, vicious gossip, and propensity to defame anyone who disagrees with her. Neither can be dealt with rationally by reasoning with them. It's been tried. It doesn't work.

2. I have exposed his real identity as Antonio F. Lopez which effectively exposes him as having committed the computer crime of Internet Criminal Impersonation. The other crimes he has committed are now tied to his real name rather than allowing him to hide behind the name of a young, innocent kid, which is what he's been doing up until now.

His goal here is to intimidate me into stopping my exposure of him without him having to back off his public lies about me so that he can continue the cyberharassment with impunity.

This is the indicator that he is a cyberstalker/harasser:

1. "Both types of bullying are acts of aggression, are repeated, and involve a power imbalance between the victim(s) and perpetrator(s)." (extracted from above quotes)

2. "Resentful stalkers are fully aware the victim is cognizant of the stalking, but continues to fulfill a distorted vendetta he/she feels is warranted. Fear and distress experienced by the victim are the goals of this type of stalker." (extracted from above quotes)

In my opinion, Kreepy's rage is fueled by the fact that he is not succeeding in his goal as described in item 2 above, so he chooses to escalate his lame attempts to intimidate and harass to try to achieve that goal.

He ignores the reasonable and rational solution offered because it would establish a power balance and it's the imbalance he desperately seeks to maintain as item 1 indicates.

"Psychiatrists, psychologists, and other mental health professionals view most stalkers as suffering from a psychiatric illness(s) causing them to be psychotic or delusional. When not deemed as psychotic, stalkers are considered plagued by some type of personality disorder or fueled by unique psychological factors. In the most severe cases, the stalker is defined as a predatory stalker or sociopath." (extracted from above quotes)

[caption id="attachment_422" align="aligncenter" width="645"] Kree Love posts bounty on Kitty Hundal[/caption]

January 15 Update

Well it looks like Kreepy found a taker for his bounty.

Now, let me just say, that it's highly ironic and amusing that Kreepy who claims to be an 'IT expert' has to bribe someone to take my sites down. I mean isn't he like a l33t h8x0r teen genius or something? Or perhaps his l33tness is as much a fraud as his identity and his numerous others cons and scams.

[caption id="attachment_432" align="aligncenter" width="520"] Kreepys alleged qualifications[/caption]

If the person who accepted the bribe were to succeed in bringing my sites down (and given what I know of the skillsets of FB 'h8x0rs', it's unlikely) I have to wonder how he plans to keep them down and ensure I don't repost.

Does he believe in magic or something. Lol!

To view the screenshot, click on it. When it opens in a new tab click on it again to enlarge the image and it will be readable.

[caption id="attachment_427" align="aligncenter" width="205"] Kreepy finds a taker on his bounty[/caption]

This documentation will spread out through several posts to keep the posts from getting too long, convoluted and difficult to follow. Consider this the Introduction to the topic.

The format will be to take the profile and demonstrate through screenshots of Kreepy's actual behavior how that behavior matches the profile of a cyberharasser/stalker.

Bully: Antonio F. Lopez aka Kree Love. The Identification In Detail

Antonio F. Lopez aka Kree Love aka Peter Pan (okay the last one is a joke but that's the name he's currently being tagged with on Facebook and it's very appropriate. Lol).

This post describes in detail the process that I used to identify him so that people understand why I consider his identification irrefutable. I can't take full credit for this. I did receive some help from an unnamed source who pointed me in the right directions so that I could find what I need. Thanks go to that source.

Some of my conclusions don't agree with theirs but I'll explain exactly why I'm coming to the conclusions that I am.

So, the first clue to draw my attention was this post that appeared on the Exposing Illegal Child Trafficking and Scammers Page on Facebook which contains the original DarkNet Child Trafficking Scam document exposing Kree Love's scam.

This person has identified Kree Love as Antonio Lopez but at this point it's merely an assertion and I have no idea why.

[caption id="attachment_357" align="aligncenter" width="528"] Kree identifed by someone else as Antonio Lopez[/caption]

Then I find out from the unnamed source that I should look at two aliases KingSamLopez and KingSam15, examine them thoroughly and I should be able to get at the truth. I took that person's advice and began my search.

Now, just to be clear. There really is a 16 year old whose name is Kree Love, who has a mother named Jayda Love living in Oxford. This 16 year old was the one photographed and interviewed at Occupy London. He claimed to be 18 but was a 15 year old runaway at the time. The real Kree Love's basic biography which indicates that he's a gamer, and worked for his mothers company DottyPixxal is true. However, there is no evidence that this real Kree Love moved out of the UK. He was born there and I did find his birth information as well as the picture that was attached to the article quoting him at Occupy London. His image has now been removed from the article and I will not be posting either his image or the birth information which I located because he's a minor and an innocent party who probably has no idea how seriously his reputation is being trashed online by Antonio F. Lopez.

Antonio F. Lopez at the age of 27, appears to have adopted the then 13 year old Kree Love's biography when he began his impersonation of Kree Love in 2010.

You will need to follow through on all of the screenshots right to the end in order to understand the process.

The following item turned out to be the key piece of information. This is an old account of KingSamLopez which is now deleted but can be found on two YouTube videos uploaded by Emma PowerRanger. I've done a paused screenshot so that it's easier to view the information. This is not information that he's able to delete because he didn't post it and YouTube isn't going to remove it since it appears to be promoting him and not attacking him.

Note the following:

1. KingSamLopez identifies himself as Antonio

2. This is an old account created in 2007 long before KingSamLopez started identifying as 'Kree Love'.

3. He states that he is 24 in 2007 which would make him 30 today.

4. He identifies the blog, kingsam15.blogspot.com as his. This particular clue is important so keep it in mind as you view the rest of the screenshots.

[caption id="attachment_356" align="aligncenter" width="611"] KingSamLopez alias identifies as Antonio[/caption]

The videos:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwS_VByk37w

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0iZS3LYPX0

In 2010, at the age of 27, Antonio had an altercation with a teenager using the alias Jamie McKinley when he flew into a jealous rage because McKinley's gaming system was better than his. He tried to cyberbully him, failed and ended up getting pwned by Jamie, a teenager with some very good computer skills for a teen. It looks like that's when he decided to run for cover and hide by pretending to be someone else. He doesn't like to deal with the consequences of his own actions.

I've gone into that story in the blog post, Kree Love: Evidence of Lies. It's actually pretty funny how this 30 year old alleged IT expert gets thoroughly pwned and ends up running for cover. Lol. So read it if you want a good laugh. This isn't a detailed version and some of the funniest stuff isn't included like the times that someone was using a hacking tool to block KingSamLopez from accessing any of his YouTube accounts. There is a post where KingSamLopez is complaining that he hasn't been able to access YouTube for 2 days and a couple of videos where this other person is demonstrating how he blocked KingSamLopez from accessing those accounts. Lol. You could find that stuff by doing a Google Search. I have the screenshots and have downloaded those videos but didn't really want to bother getting into all of the gory, if not completely hilarious details.

In 2010, we have the appearance of Kree Love alias Krazium who claims to have been in contact with ID Chief on DarkNet and claims to have new ID which shows that he's an adult. An argument could be made here that this profile is the real Kree Love and that he did move to Manhattan but given his age it's unlikely that he would have been able to do that and attend Columbia while living on his own. It's more likely that Antonio knew the real Kree Love and created this profile based on both information that he knew as well as the personna he wanted to present of himself. In 2010 Kree Love was 13 and this was 2 years before he was reported as 15 year old runaway in 2012.

[caption id="attachment_89" align="aligncenter" width="567"] Antonio F. Lopez now claims to be Kree Love[/caption]

In 2011, we have KingSam15 identifying himself as Kree Love. The biography is consistent with the 'Krazium' biography established in 2010 shown above.

A new piece of information has been added that you should keep in mind. He now also states that he knows Basic Russian.



[caption id="attachment_359" align="aligncenter" width="645"] KingSam15 says hes Kree Love in 2011[/caption]

Here we have a screenshot of Pilar Hernandez, the mother of Antonio F. Lopez who had previously lived with a Russian boyfriend whom she split from. Antonio previously lived in the US and has now moved in with his mother in Oxford. Since there is an overlap in the years that the boyfriend was there and that Antonio moved in with his mother he likely learned some basic Russian from the boyfriend.

[caption id="attachment_360" align="aligncenter" width="645"] Pilar Hernandez Mother of Antonio F. Lopez[/caption]

Note that both Pilar Hernandez, Antonio F. Lopez mother and Jayda Love, the real Kree Love's mother live in Oxford. See the next screenshot giving Jayda Love's corporate information for DottyPixxal dissolution on May 24, 2011.



Now the following profile of KingSam15 which claims to be Kree Love in 2011, claims the blog kingsam15.blogspot.com as his.

This is the same blog which KingSamLopez, who identified as 24 year old Antonio, also claimed was his blog in 2007.

This confirms that the KingSam15 alias and the KingSamLopez alias are indeed the same person.

[caption id="attachment_362" align="aligncenter" width="603"] KingSam15 identifies the kingsam15 blog as his. This makes the link between the KingSamLopez alias which stated his name was Antonio in 2007 and the KingSam15 alias which claims to be Kree Love starting in 2011. They are the same person[/caption]

Now note that in this post, Jamie McKinley identifies KingSamLopez as Antonio Lopez.

[caption id="attachment_363" align="aligncenter" width="645"] Kree Love Exposed As Antonio Lopez By Jamie[/caption]

And in this post, KingSam15 (using the same profile photo that the current Kree Love impersonator uses) admits that McKinley has located him therefore he identifed him correctly.

[caption id="attachment_85" align="aligncenter" width="645"] Kree lying on Google Groups about McKinley and admitting that McKinley identified him correctly[/caption]

Here is his current Facebook profile which now fully adopts the 2010 Kree Love biography, alias, krazium, and uses the image from the Google Groups profile above. This connects the current profile to the previous profile kingsam15 which as I demonstrated connects to kingsamlopez. There is a direct line connecting each item and leading to the current item.

[caption id="attachment_409" align="aligncenter" width="645"] Kree Love aka Antonio Lopez current Facebook profile[/caption]

Given all of the above, the only reasonable and logical conclusion that we can come to here in my opinion is that KingSamLopez who is Antonio F. Lopez began using the KingSam15 alias to impersonate Kree Love starting around 2010 or so. In my opinion, this evidence is pretty irrefutable.

The fact that he has shown identification under Kree Love's name simply proves that he has false or real stolen identification which he uses to back his story. It doesn't prove that he's Kree Love.

I believe that he does know Kree Love given their geographical proximity and he may also have attended Occupy London. At the very least he knows enough about him and his activities to impersonate him successfully even with people who met the real Kree Love at Occupy London.

I haven't included the American side of his family yet nor will I for now.

If he removes the lies he's had posted about me everywhere and stops impersonating the young Kree Love, I won't post anything about that side of his family and won't continue to identify him further.

If he doesn't, then I will proceed. He's pretty slow on the uptake so I'll give him a little time. Lol.

Setting aside what Antonio has done to me (that will be tomorrow's post) the fact is he is destroying the reputation of an innocent 16 year old and likely drawing all sorts of unwarranted local and international police attention his way

This could have major repercussions to the young, real Kree Love that could impact his life permanently.

And Antonio is doing all of this just so that he can engage in cyberbullying/harassment/stalking campaigns, as well as theft, fraud and cons online with impunity.

I can't think of much that's more vile and despicable than doing that to an innocent minor.

The CyberBullies: How Far Will They Go? 2

In recent weeks, Brian Johnson, a Facebook anti-pedophilia social activist has been the focal point of much of the abuse currently being heaped on quite a few of us. Why? Who knows? Irrational people are irrational so you can't expect to find a rational reason.

My guess is that 'Peter Pan' (as he's becoming known on Facebook) and his shills have set Brian up to be targeted. 'Peter Pan' is 30 year old American Antonio F. Lopez who is impersonating a 16 year old UK teen, Kree Love. Antonio is the only one with a real motivation to go after Brian, as far as I know.

However, Antonio is quite the chickenshit and prefers to set others up to do his dirty work for him either directly or through his shills because:

1. he can't take what he so easily dishes out to others.

2. he and his shills, Thomas Schroeder (aka Thomas Cook, Juliet Biehl and numerous others) and Julie Ann Larson (aka Rusalka Sireen, Javeria Laila and numerous others) are quite incompetent whether it's technically or socially and as a result not very good at doing this stuff themselves. They can be convincing to the stupid who don't check anything out or verify it or have some self-serving reason to buy their bullshit.

3. Brian is well-connected in FB Anon circles and is one of the few people I know of who managed to pull off creating a group of over 10000 members in just a few weeks. His own friends list numbers in the thousands and he doesn't have to fake his numbers by using software that adds fake friends, like the RatKrew has been known to do. He is a credit to the Anonymous name in every way that matters and an asset.

As a result, like 'Peter Pan', Kreepy has had to skulk around and manipulate the stupid into doing his dirty work for him whether it's by convincing a group like ClownSec or by stealing members from these existing groups that are easy for the shills to manipulate.

Unfortunately, while Michael Babcock does have some criminal computing skills and is crazy enough to be easily manipulated, he's also a loose cannon who will snitch on anyone given the opportunity and so is completely untrustworthy to work with in any capacity. ALL convos will end up on pastebin. While he smugly and self-righteously runs around talking about OpSec, he doesn't understand real OpSec.

He, like Kreepy, are good at hiding their IPs because they're criminals and need to hide. Good OpSec is a lot more than just hiding one's IP and it has little to do with hiding one's identity. It's something good Hactivists pay attention to and understand.

Since Michael is really just a necessary evil at this time, they keep looking for others that are more controllable so that they aren't relying on him when he does the inevitable 'stab them in the back' routine..

ClownSec, MTA and BTY (Kage) have turned out to be the easiest for the RatKrew to control. ClownSec went down first and brought MTA and BTY (Kage) down with them later. Essentially they've just become stooges and goons for the #RATKREW which isn't that much smarter than they are.

The RatKrews set ups and deceptions are usually pretty obvious for anyone who uses their brain to see through so that really says quite a lot about those who don't see through them.

The evidence of that stupidity is the hit list they've come up with and the bizarre reasons that people have been placed on it. Most are there because of the RatKrew. None of the actual allegations they make against anyone on the hitlist are true and none can be substantiated in any way. For example, they call people pedophiles and post as evidence, irrelevant criminal records related to drug possession.

Um yeah. That makes sense ... to an idiot. Lol.

Or they provide fabricated evidence that they don't publicize because it is fabricated and they don't want the person they're lying about to be able to challenge it. Like the pedophile site Babcock created to frame one of the people on the hit list. Or the evidence they're circulating alleging that I'm a 'child stalker'.

Yep. Their evidence sure sounds legit. Imma buy that load. Lol.

They've collected other irrelevant, useless information on some people, all of which is completely unrelated to the false accusations, and they declare that evidence when it's actually just being used to spin a smear from and is usually something innocent and innocuous without the bullshit spin. Lol.

They all turned themselves into a joke when they joined up with the RatKrew and have gone full on retard since.

Brian has been the main focus of their cyberharassment campaigns in the last few weeks and as usual the person with the motivation to target Brian is Kreepy (Kree Love aka Antonio F. Lopez).

So the shills have been busy lobbying and the goons have been busy harassing.

They've also been escalating this into some pretty vicious real life harassment.

The following is only one single incident and involved the police because the cyberharassers dragged the police into this. There have been others which didn't involve the police (to our knowledge) mainly because Brian isn't a snitch and didn't want to involve the police no matter how ugly things got.

1. A female voice, presumably someone in the cyberharassment circle, called the State Police and pretended to be Brian's aunt.

2. She claimed that two 'big black men' were breaking into Brian's parents home where Brian is living temporarily.

3. Brian was at work and his parents were home alone.

4. The State Police called the local police and sent them to Brian's parents home.

5. The State Police then called the home when the police had stationed themselves outside and asked if there had been a break-in.

6. The parents said that there hadn't been.

7. The State Police notified the parents of the large police presence outside the home (6 patrol cars).

The investigating officers who attended the home then questioned the parents in order to find out what was going on. The parents explained the situation that Brian was dealing with in detail and all of that information is now in police hands.

No doubt those involved will blame Brian's parents for 'snitching' because they are incapable of taking responsibility for their own actions and the situation that they created which could only have had this result. It couldn't have ended any other way because even without having the information, the crimes that were committed were serious enough that the police would have pursued it.

As Brian said, 'They fucked themselves over real good this time." (paraphrased).

Congrats ladies. Hope you enjoy being the princesses you will no doubt be turned into when you get arrested, charged and convicted for this one.

Since this is in the hands of the police I don't want to interfere in what is probably an active police investigation by publishing information identifying those involved so will be withholding it until they're arrested. When arrests occur I will provide more details and all of their identifying information.

Bully: Dan Cooper/Dan Carol

We are still verifying his real identity. Dan Cooper/Dan Carol/Kaptn Fahkin Kage is just a few of several aliases he uses on Facebook, however, his MO is quite consistent.

We don't think this is the person who uses the Kage alias. We think this person used the Kaptn Fahkin Kage alias to manipulate us into believing it's Kage. We're not buying it.

1. He hates anti-pedophilia activists so we are beginning to suspect that he may be a pedophile.

2. He uses extreme and deceptive methods to frame anti-pedophilia social activists to make them look like they are pedophiles.

Let me give you a recent example of a stunt he played on me. I expect that you will be seeing numerous photoshopped screenshots in groups that I'm not a member which will allege to be evidence of my 'child stalking' based on this so I may as well expose it from the start :-)

This is what crazy people do and remember that these are the people Jennifer Emick is using as her trusted sources for the deceptions she uses to attack me on Twitter. ROFL. She should be ashamed of herself but she won't be.

The strategy that Dan Cooper/Dan Carol/Kaptn Fahkin Kage  uses

1. He'll hit your Page or Account with innocuous but leading comments.

2. He then waits for you to respond. He may make quite a few and bury them, presumably so that you don't know what he's going to use against you. Although he doesn't always do this and in this case he didn't.

3. After you respond and give him something he can use, he deletes all of his comments and then deletes the fake accounts he used.

He has someone screenshotting them for him but wants to remove them so that you don't get a chance to get screenshots of them.

This makes it easy for him to photoshop the shots and create deceptions to set you up and difficult for you to defend yourself.

Unfortunately, he seems to have forgotten that there is such a thing as Email Notifications. Mine are turned on. Yes it's a bit annonying but worth it in circumstances like this because I always have evidence of these communications.

On Jan 1, he posts the following item to the following post. Since he removed it I can't show both together..





Okay so the link to the post, 'The Cyberbullies: How Far Will They Go, 1' is the top one. The current alias of Kaptn Fahkin Kage (no, it isn't Kage) responds to that post with the comment, 'I've gone further.'.

I respond sarcastically here with something along the lines of: 'Really? Then maybe you should drop your picture so I can do a special Page about you?' referring, of course to the anti-bullying blog.

He now sends me a link to an almost nude picture of a young adult male that he uploaded to his page which looks similar to someone that we think might be him but we have no confirmation at this time. He also makes the comment attached to the picture, 'As per your request, toots'.

Well ... No. I didn't request that and he knows perfectly well I didn't.

And so, the deception begins:



Again I make a sarcastic comment: 'You need a bra, sweetie.'

The image, comments and account were all deleted almost immediately after I looked. I'm assuming he waited for me to comment and once I did removed everything after screenshotting it.

Now it isn't Rocket Science to see how:

1. screenshots of the first two comments with one minor touchup like excluding or changing which main post the comments are associated with could change the entire meaning of what was said.

2. which picture the second comments are associated with (changing to a teenager) might be taken out of context and misrepresented to make me look like a 'child stalker'.

Kreepy has a huge credibility problem these days. Everyone's demanding proof of his pathological lies. He's left with no other choice but to get his shills to convince others to fabricate frame-ups. Especially since his lame attempts to discredit me haven't worked with anyone other than Jennifer Emick (which really tells you all you need to know about her level of stupid. Lol).

Of course this one's going to be as big a FAIL as the other ones. ROFL.

We've established that this is this particular persons pattern of behavior. He does this regularly to people. I'm not the first and he does indeed run around self-righteously pontificating about how evil certain people are based on the screenshots that he set them up for.

We also know that he associates with Kree Love (Antonio F. Lopez) and was on the Bone Yard under different aliases.

So, we're working on identifying him and when we do he'll appear here.

What Is CyberBullying?

Cyber bullying (cyber-bullying, online bullying) is the use of electronic information and communication devices such as e-mail, instant messaging, text messages, blogs, mobile phones, pagers, and defamatory websites to bully or otherwise harass an individual or group through personal attacks or other means, and it may constitute a computer crime.

Cyberbullying is willful and involves recurring or repeated harm inflicted through the medium of electronic text. According to R.B. Standler (2002)[1]bullying intends to cause emotional distress and has no legitimate purpose to the choice of communications. Cyberbullying can be as simple as continuing to send e-mail to someone who has said they want no further contact with the sender. Cyberbullying may also include threats, sexual remarks, pejorative labels (i.e., hate speech)

The term cyberbullying was first used by Canadian educator Bill Belsey, creator of the Web site www.bullying.org. Other terms for Cyber-bullying are "electronic bullying," "e-bullying," "sms bullying," "mobile bullying," "online bullying," "digital bullying," or "Internet bullying." --CyberBullying Wiki

Irrespective of what these people want to call themselves to establish Internet street cred in order to give themselves a veneer of 'coolness' or what they claim to be in their real lives in order to give themselves a veneer of credibility or authority, what they actually are is nothing but goons and criminals.

Cyberbullying is indeed a computer crime when one examines the various facets of what it is the cyberbullies actually do.

Now, let me just be clear that, in my opinion, there's a difference between hacktivism and computer crimes.

Historically, civil rights movements have broken laws which were unjust or covered up corruption. The Hactivists represent the new civil rights movements and I don't consider them criminals. What they are doing has a socially redeeming goal whether that's exposing corruption, enforcing transparency, or using dDos or interruptions of service to protest (virtual sit-ins).

That said, let's do that by examining the actual demonstrable activities of some of the people engaging in other computer crimes while engaging in the computer crime of cyberharassment..

Note that these people have, for the most part, committed multiple computer crimes. In the case of some, numerous computer crimes. I am only focusing on the single most obvious one they've committed and the one that is easiest to prove.

They also make the same allegations about us but have never explicitly and publicly demonstrated that I or most of the other people they've targeted have done the things they claim. All they do is screech their lies and frame people with obvious frame-ups that anyone with half a brain should be able to see through.

They have some evidence against one person of some minor things (not the things they actually allege he did). Everything else is exaggerations of minor offences, misrepresentations of innocent events, blatant lies or fabrications. They use the small amount of evidence that they do have against that one person to attempt to establish credibility with their bullshit and lies against everyone else.

Since that one person also has a lot of people who dislike him for various reasons, he's the bait they use to recruit people to target everyone else.

1. Antonio F. Lopez

[caption id="attachment_10" align="alignleft" width="300"] Kree Love aka Antonio F. Lopez[/caption]

Antonio is a 30 year old American who moves back and forth from the US to the UK. When in the UK he usually lives with his mother in Oxford.

He is impersonating a 16 year old UK teenager named Kree Love online.

He is familiar with details of Kree Love's biography which he has established as his own and has identification in Kree Love's name.

The real Kree Love is a teenager who ran away from home when he was 15 and joined the Occupy London group living in their encampment. He was interviewed by the media, photographed at the time and claimed to be 18. This was a story he told consistently to any members of the Occupy London group he associated with as well. Presumably he just didn't want to deal with the potential fall out if anyone found out he was a runaway. He's an attractive and apparently bright young man who probably has no idea what is being done to his name and reputation online.

Given that both Antonio F. Lopez and Kree Love's mothers live in the same area it's quite likely, in my opinion, that Antonio actually knows Kree Love and that access is probably what he was able to take advantage of whether it was by stealing his identification or by conning the teenager into giving him permission to use it.

Either way, it's a computer crime because the real Kree wasn't old enough to give permission when he was under 16 and whether he would be considered old enough to give permission at the age of 16 is dependent on the law in the UK.

That's not a question that I can answer.

The details on how I know this and the evidence collected will appear in another blog in a few days.

Antonio has impersonated others as well when he created fake Facebook accounts in order to cyberstalk people. His latest was an attempt to friend my Facebook page and join Jay Marshall's anti-pedophilia Facebook group,Op Scarecrow, by creating a fake profile of an existing real life Florida artist. I won't tell you what mistakes were made and how Jay and I exposed him because, in this particular case, doing that will simply give him what he needs to cover his tracks better next time and we don't want that.

All criminals have defining modus operandis and impersonating real people is Antonio's MO.

He has also committed numerous other computer crimes including fraud, cons, theft, and claiming professional expertise in areas where he either just has a basic knowledge or may have no knowledge at all.

His claims to be a programmer were exposed as false rather quickly when he was unable to identify my Anonygrans web site in his defamatory and false dox on Doxbin as a Flash site and claimed it was a WordPress site.

His posting of the Doxbin dox is a violation of the California Penal Code where he has lived.

He is running a defamatory libelous blog attacking me directly with some pretty vicious and unsubstantiated lies like alleging that I'm a 'child stalker' as well as using the typically demagogic strategy of taking things out of context and misrepresenting them.

Antonio was part of the RIP Tards and appears to get a great deal of pleasure out of hurting people.

Antonio, impersonating Kree Love, also claims that he wants to be Fed double agent. Getting paid from both sides presumably. From a Skype Chat with another person:

[3/11/12 10:41:31 AM] Kree Love: It would cost me

[3/11/12 10:41:40 AM] Kree Love: $2800 to get an online associates degree

[3/11/12 10:41:43 AM] Kree Love: from Salford University [Editor: ref to http://www.salford.ac.uk/ (Corrected from Stanford)]

[3/11/12 10:41:53 AM] Kree Love: in Counter Terrorism

[3/11/12 10:41:57 AM]Kree Love: which allows me to apply for jobs

[3/11/12 10:42:02 AM] Kree Love: in the NSA and FBI.

[removed]

[3/11/12 10:48:24 AM] Kree Love: CHUNDER MOTHERFUCKER

[removed]: you gonna work for them ? You MF traitor

[3/11/12 10:48:33 AM] Kree Love: Nein.

[3/11/12 10:48:37 AM] [removed]: I got your MF bitch

[3/11/12 10:48:48 AM] Kree Love: I'll just double agent for a bit.

[removed]

[3/11/12 10:55:01 AM] Kree Love: I just want to be legally allowed to carry a fully armed supressed handgun on the streets of New York and London

[3/11/12 10:55:04 AM] Kree Love: wearing a suit.

2. Heather Martin

[caption id="attachment_11" align="alignleft" width="300"] Heather Martin of Saskatoon CyberBully[/caption]

Heather is a 43 year old Registered Nurse employed at a large Saskatoon Hospital, who engages in what used to be considered a hate crime in Canada but is still considered a crime. Committing Defamatory Libel in Canada is a Criminal Code offense. Cyberstalking is considered Criminal Harassment.

She runs a defamatory libelous and vitriolic hate blog targeting a single individual, well known and well respected, anti-pedophilia social activist Kevin Annett.

She engages in cyberstalking Kevin to groups that he's a member of and which she has no interest (she's religious, has demonstrated a vitriolic hatred of atheists in her blog, yet joins atheist groups that Kevin is in).

She spreads rumors behind the scenes consisting of vicious and unsubstantiated allegations about Mr. Annett in order to convince others both to remove their support of him and his social activist causes and to defame him.

Since she started that blog, others have created similar style blogs targeting her in, in the same way, in retaliation. While I don't agree with that style of retaliation one can hardly blame people for reacting to her abuse against Mr. Annett so strongly.

If anyone defends Kevin, their name, along with the most vicious and unsubstantiated defamatory libel will be added to her hate blog as mine has and others like First Nations social activist and member of AIM, Charley Brown.

Here’s what WikiSpooks has to say about Kevin Annett, the person this woman has chosen to defame:

Kevin D. Annett (aka. Kevin McNamee-Annett, and Eagle Strong Voice born 1956 in Edmonton, Alberta) is a Canadian writer and former minister of the United Church of Canada. He has authored three books about Canadian aboriginals - Love and Death in the Valley, Hidden from History: The Canadian Holocaust and Unrepentant: Disrobing the Emperor.

His treatment at the hands of the Canadian Establishment over his persistent, selfless advocacy for the indiginous populations of Canada, is an object lesson in the gross self-seving dishonesties, corruptions and hypocricies of power.

Filing false police reports and complaints against those she doesn't like is also standard practice for Heather and something that she has publicly admitted to on the Internet. When those false reports and complaints get ignored because ... well ... they're false, she decides that the person she filed them against must be under RCMP protection and an agent. Lol. Seriously.



Heather appears to be a person with a hair trigger temper and a vindictive mean streak. It doesn't take much to get her going and attempts to reason with her will be met with failure.

I know. I tried.

Heather's modus operandi is misrepresentation combined with outrageous lies that have shock value.

3. Michael Babcock

[caption id="attachment_12" align="alignleft" width="237"] Michael Babcock aka N2KMaster CyberBully[/caption]

Michael is 30 years old claims to have a job now and yet still manages to spend hours on his computer in Cambridge Narrows, (outskirts of Moncton) New Brunswick.

He considers himself a l33t h8x0r and Guru of the Internet. He has no formal training in IT but has picked up a few tricks of the trade as a hobbyist and thinks he knows more than people who have had years of training and experience on the job and in the industry.

Most, if not all of that time appears to be spent committing computer crimes of various types including the framing of one of the people on their hit list to support their lies that he's a pedophile by creating a fake site using his name as the domain name. I discuss this in detail and provide evidence in the post, CyberBullies: How Far Will They Go?

In the area of computer crimes I will accept the fact that he is far more skilled and adept at committing computer crimes than I am since I'm not a criminal and don't commit computer crimes. I admit that my knowledge is severely lacking in that particular area of expertise. Lol.

He, like Heather, admits publicly to filing false police reports and complaints against people he obsesses about.He, on the other hand, doesn't appear to notice or care that he's being ignored by these agencies and it doesn't stop him from obsessively filing more. He's been doing this all year and including me in these reports completely without cause, despite the fact that I have explicitly told him that I had nothing to do with these incidents and he has no evidence that I did.



This plus the following are the demonstrable indications that he appears to suffer from sort of extreme obsessive disorder.

For example, it wasn't enough for him to post one dox to AnonPaste.me a site where the pastes could not be removed unless the original poster kept a special delete link provided at the time of the original posting.

In fact, it's never enough no matter what the situation.

He used an autobot to flood the site with thousands of false, defamatory libelous pastes calling someone a pedophile and me and others pedophile enablers for no other reason than we associate with him.

Using an autobot to flood a site with data, in and of itself a criminal offense. He admitted doing this in an email. OTOH the likelihood that AnonPaste.me would have cared or charged him is nil.

Shortly after Michael did that the site was confiscated by Interpol and the owners arrested. I have no idea what the impact of Interpol seeing thousands of posts calling me a pedophile enabler will have on me or even worse the impact it will have on the person being falsely accused of being a pedophile.

Everything Michael does he does to extreme which indicates that he may have some very serious, untreated psychological issues.

Who Is The Target? Anonymous?

Anyone can become a target of cyberbullies whether you're just an individual hanging out with personal friends and family on social media or whether you're a social activist. All that really has to happen is for you to cross paths with people like those named in this blog, trigger some paranoid delusion of theirs and you're on their hit list.

The entire point of this blog is to send out the message that people are standing up to these bullies by exposing their deceptions when they target and harass people.

Of course when you do that the bullies almost always accuse their targets of bullying by either playing the victim card themselves or falsely accusing them of bullying others. In their bizarre and twisted minds, it's bullying to defend yourself against bullying. Lol.

I believe that one of the reasons that many teenagers who are the victim of this crime end up committing suicide is that we, as a society, disempower them. We tell these victims to just 'ignore it and it will go away'.

Those of us who have been targets of this crime know perfectly well that harassers, bullies, and stalkers whether they're online or in real life do not just go away. They become empowered and enabled when you try to ignore them and will go to more and more extreme lengths to get your attention. They might get distracted by someone else for periods of time or they might stop for periods of time but you will never be off their hit list once you're on it. You have to have good strategies to make them go away.

In my previous blog post I talked about a person who is being effectively framed by these harassers as a pedophile. He does ignore them for the most part and yet he has been targeted in the most vicious way imaginable.

The 'ignore it and it will go away' approach only works in normal situations where normal people have normal fights with each other. In those situations it's best for both parties to separate and cool off and even if only one party does it, the other party will often just move on.

What differentiates those situations from situations which involve full-blown harassment, is that the people engaging in full-blown harassment, for the most part, do actually suffer from some sort of anti-social personality disorder and they do it because they get pleasure out of seeing people hurt and suffering. They enjoy destroying lives and that is their goal.

The phenomenon that we're seeing on the Internet is that those same people no longer have to be in close physical proximity to get together and engage in their abuse. As a result we are seeing the development of entire groups of people getting together who have similar histories of harassment and bullying and those people are working together. Sweeney talks about this phenomenon in his book, Hackers on Steroids.

There are several groups running around on Facebook right now who are focusing on and targeting social activists who are associated with Anonymous and their friends. Most of the social activists targeted are anti-pedophilia activists who are identifying and reporting pedophiles both on FaceBook and on DarkNet.

Some are just associated with individuals on the list but refused to drink the harassment kult kool-aid and ended up on the their hit list.

Since many Anons have objected to the behavior of these harassers they are now claiming that they are 'not Anons' nor do they support Anonymous, yet they join numerous Anonymous groups under numerous socks and by doing so create the implication that they are Anons or at the very least support Anonymous.

If they're not Anons and don't support Anonymous then why do they care what anyone does who is involved in or supports Anonymous or engages in social activism under the Anonymous banner? Do they think Anons are too stupid to locate pedophiles in their own ranks by themselves and deal with them? What business do they even have joining Anonymous groups?

One of the impacts of their actions has been that a lot of very good people are talking about removing their support for Anonymous and walking away because these crazies are creating so much disruption with their deceptions, threats and harassment that those targeted are finding it difficult to even focus on the causes they've given their hearts to.

Some are people who are solid social activists and who have contributed a great deal under the Anonymous banner all of which presents a positive public face to Anonymous.

If these good people start leaving, the name Anonymous will become solely tied to and associated with cyberharassment, cyberbullying and cyberstalking all of which are criminal acts with no socially redeeming qualities, because frankly that's who'll be left.

Then, it will just be a question of time before these groups start fighting with each other or targeting individuals in their own ranks. Some of that has already started. Maybe we'll get lucky and they'll focus on each other instead of targeting innocents. Since they all enjoy it so much they could have a lot of fun destroying each other. Now there's a thought. :)

Will that end the harassment of those individuals currently on their hit lists. Probably not but it will mean that new people will not be so easily accessible to them once this reputation gets established for Anonymous and it's well on it's way to establishing that reputation for itself thanks both to the cyberharassers and those Anons who repeatedly take the position that they 'don't want to get involved in the drama.'

They are involved in the drama whether they like or not because these cyberharassment groups have dragged everyone into the drama and done so quite successfully. Silence is assent.

And there is going to be an inevitable fall out to Anonymous as a result.

That's something that those who are actively supporting and advocating the concept of Anonymous should give some thought to when they tell those social activists who have been unjustly targeted that 'they don't want to get involved in the drama'. Just saying ...

Two very good people, who have worked very hard and shown a great deal of dedication to the Anonymous anti-pedophilia cause are Brian Johnson and Jay Marshall.

Brian Johnson is a hacktivist and Jay Marshall is an Anonymous supporter like myself.

While Jay's name and dox haven't appeared on the hit list web site yet he's constantly dealing with harassers who are trying to convince him to go along with their harassment of the individuals on the hit list

Since he consistently refuses to go along with it he gets targeted with vicious rumors on an ongoing basis.

Brian Johnson has been placed on the hit list web site and has been lied about repeatedly as the cyberharassers desperately dig for dirt and constantly misrepresent innocent situations and relationships because they can't find any real dirt on him.

The minor things that they have found and are exaggerating are laughable given their personal backgrounds and histories. Therein lies their own shameless hypocrisy in all of this.

That is, they'll self-righteously pontificate about the evils of a person getting arrested for having weed while some of them have similar backgrounds, far worse backgrounds, or are into far stronger drugs.

And what would that have to do with the social activism that the person is involved in anyway. Absolutely nothing. It's nothing more than an attempt to smear the person in an as many ways as possible.

Antonio F. Lopez, the 30 year old American who is impersonating UK teen Kree Love online, has been digging deep for dirt on me as well and has found nothing. So he employs the same strategies that have been used against Brian and others by both him, members of his little harassment cult as well as other little harassment cults.

The general strategy employed and one which has been used on all of us to one degree or another is:

1. Do an Internet search on the target

2. Collect any identifying information that will also help you identify family, friends, employers (past and present), organizations the person supports or is involved in, etc.

3. Use both 1 and 2 (by contacting people directly) to dig up dirt on the person.

4. If you find something and it's 'evil' you're golden. If you find something and it's minor, exaggerate it way out of proportion. If you find nothing take what you have and see if you can fabricate some negative spin on it. If there's nothing fabricate something. If people don't buy it, frame the person.

5. After they're done brown-nosing your family and friends for dirt on you, they will then proceed to target them by posting their pictures in memes all over the place, making harassing phone calls, etc. and often far worse.

Antonio has added a new component to this by going to my past employers and lying to them despite the fact that I no longer work there. Don't ask me what the point of that was. These people are completely nuts. They are beyond the ken of normal people.

He is also the one that has initiated these frame-ups which he tries to keep quiet so that those he targets can't defend themselves. The fabricated evidence is distributed behind the persons back.

The pro-pedophilia web site that was created in one of the victims names was never posted publicly that I'm aware of, just in private groups where they thought we wouldn't find out about it. It has also been given to people privately as alleged evidence.

He claims that he has caught me stalking children. Given the frame-up of the person with the pro-pedophilia site I can't even imagine what despicable frame-up he's fabricated involving me and is distributing to people behind my back. Whatever it is, I have no doubt I could refute it in the 5 minutes it took me to expose and refute the pro-pedophilia site. I have never stalked children or anyone else.

As Sweeney mentioned in his book, a few years ago the RIP trolls consisted of a couple of hundred people on Facebook. Thanks to his hard work those groups broke up and the numbers dwindled, especially after a few people started getting arrested and faced substantial prison terms for their crimes. Thank You UK.

It looks to me like Antonio F. Lopez using the Kree Love alias misses those days and is trying to recreate those harassment groups. The only difference now is that he's focusing on social activists rather than the grieving families and friends of dead children and the harassment is extending beyond Facebook and on to other social media groups as well as the Internet at large.

Aside from the numerous hate blogs created by the seriously obsessive Michael Babcock, one of which is listed under a domain name which uses the name of the target they use to lure in recruits and bait them into targeting others, Babcock floods sites like paste-bin with all sorts of defamatory libel, private emails, chats, etc. and floods torrent sites with gigabytes of useless irrelevant data he calls 'evidence' for his and the other harassment groups defamatory libel. His obsessions are quite extreme.

Before the Anonpaste.me site got shut down and confiscated by Interpol, Babcock had flooded it with literally thousands of defamatory libelous doxes. That is not normal behavior by any definition.

These cyberharassers try to establish some street credibility by claiming that they're just trolls, 4channers and doing it for the 'lulz' but frankly, I don't recall trolls or 4channers running around the Internet doing this sort of stuff. I'm in IT and my previous career was in libraries. I've been on the Internet or exposed to it for far longer than most.

On the rare occasions when someone appeared online and did this sort of stuff they didn't last long because the good guys dealt with them. This activity was never allowed to expand to the proportions it's expanding now since the general public has come online.

This is a recent phenomenon and it's nothing more than a bunch of people with severe to mild anti-social personality disorders getting together in groups for the like-minded, hiding behind the troll/4chan/Anonymous names to give themselves some Internet credibility so that they can rationalize their abuse of innocent people.

They are criminals committing criminal acts daily and should be treated as such. The fact that these crimes are occurring on the Internet doesn't make them less of a crime than in real life.

If treatments exist for the type of anti-social personality disorders these people display then they should also receive the mental health intervention that they appear to so desperately need.

They're behavior really says it all where that's concerned.

To those Anons who say they want to stay out of the drama: Silence is assent and they're in the middle of the drama whether they want to be or not.

To Anonymous: Do you really want the Anonymous name dragged through the mud like this. It is happening irrespective of their claims.

I'll leave with Brians words, expressed in a moment of frustration but reflecting the reality of what is happening to Anonymous because of these idiots.

[caption id="attachment_220" align="aligncenter" width="531"] Brian Johnson[/caption]